MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3166158578 · doi:10.3917/vsoc.212.0127

L’enfant et ses parents : des sujets-clés en protection de l’enfance

2021· article· fr· W3166158578 on OpenAlexaff
Sévèrine Euillet, Carl Lacharité

Bibliographic record

VenueVie sociale · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Welfare and Adoption
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Si l’État intervient dans la vie d’un enfant dont la sécurité ou le développement est compromis, c’est tout un système familial et institutionnel qui est concerné par les interventions mises en place. Interventions, dispositifs, lois qui évoluent au fil des périodes mais aussi des conceptions et des théories. Cet article vise à repérer les points de débat clés qui mobilisent ce champ et ses acteurs, à savoir : l’enfant et le parent. Parmi les nombreuses approches conceptuelles pouvant représenter des ressources pour penser l’enfant protégé et ses parents, certaines vont être mises en perspective au regard d’axes transversaux que sont la participation, la conception des besoins et la considération des perspectives des enfants et des parents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVie socialeSame topicChild Welfare and AdoptionFrench-language works237,207