Experimental and Modelling Study of a Geodesic Dome Solar Greenhouse System in Ottawa
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A building model was created in TRNSYS 17 to determine whether appropriate growing conditions can be maintained in a geodesic dome greenhouse in Ottawa, Canada, without the use of auxiliary power or heating. A microcontroller, the Arduino UNO, is used as the data collection device. In order to test the effects of ventilation, thermal mass, and solar panel shading on both the modelled and the measured results, combinations of these variables were used to create five operating scenarios. The model was calibrated and run under each of these scenarios, using actual 2015 weather data, and was also run for a full year using the CWEC weather data to compare the performance of each scenario for a typical weather year. The results indicate that air temperatures are expected to exceed acceptable ranges during a typical weather year, which indicates that further efforts will be required to heat and cool the Biodome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it