Geometric parameters of influence on rotor stator interaction in radial hydraulic turbines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Numerical methods for the prediction of the hydraulic forcing from rotor stator interaction (RSI) in hydraulic turbines as well as the corresponding methods to calculate mechanical dynamic stresses are mature and well-established in the industry. The geometric factors influencing RSI are generally known, but little information is available on the quantification of these factors with respect to RSI forcing. We present relative quantifications of four geometric factors on RSI forcing expressed as dynamic blade torque. The factors are the blade leading edge lean, the radial distance between guide vane trailing and runner leading edges, the phase between adjacent runner channels as a function of number of guide vanes and blades, and finally the number of guide vanes independently of their effect on the phase. RSI pressure pulsations on the stator in the vane-less space between guide vanes and runner show a different tendency with the variation of the blade number compared to the dynamic blade torque. This indicates that dynamic pressure measurements in the vane-less space are not a good indicator for dynamic forcing on the runner blades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".