MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3166226243 · doi:10.3897/ap.e4.e0736

Didactic Materials used in teaching French in Quebec in the 19th century

2021· article· en· W3166226243 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lina Razumova, Irina L. Merzlyakova

Bibliographic record

VenueARPHA proceedings · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoriographyConfessionalLate 19th centuryState (computer science)Period (music)SociologySocial sciencePolitical scienceLawAestheticsArtPoliticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article examines the history of the formation of the education system in Quebec in the 19th century. This period plays an important role in the historiography of the education of the region under consideration, since at the beginning of the 19th century, the main characteristics of the system of the Quebec education system were formed, its confessional division took place, and a number of significant laws were adopted. They contribute to the formation of the structure of Quebec education, the definition of its content, as well as the content of the textbooks and teaching materials used. The latter reflect not only Quebec society and its knowledge, but also pedagogical theories and methods developed and used in foreign teaching practice, in particular in France. The article also analyzes the participation of the main social actors – the state and the Church, in the process of the formation of the general education system, it is determined that the subsequent initiatives of the state in the second half of the 19th century could not significantly affect the current situation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueARPHA proceedingsSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207