MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3166308983 · doi:10.18192/rceh.v44i1.5908

Los archivos del malestar: estética y política de la infelicidad en la ficción centroamericana contemporánea (Ramiro Lacayo Deshón, Jacinta Escudos y Claudia Hernández)

2021· article· es· W3166308983 on OpenAlex
Magdalena Perkowska

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tomando como prisma teórico los planteamientos de Sianne Ngai en Ugly Feelings (2005) y de Sara Ahmed en The Promise of Happiness (2010), el presente trabajo explora las novelas Así en la tierra de Ramiro Lacayo Deshón (Nicaragua, 2009) y El asesino melancólico de Jacinta Escudos (El Salvador, 2015), así como una selección de cuentos de Claudia Hernández (Mediodía de frontera, El Salvador, 2007), para interpretar el significado crítico de la negatividad e infelicidad. Arguyo que en los textos de estos autores la frustración, la apatía, la inseguridad y la vergüenza, así como los efectos que estas emociones disfóricas producen en el lector, articulan una crítica de la lógica neoliberal que gobierna las sociedades contemporáneas, desvalorando las vidas y experiencias que no (cor)responden a la promesa de la felicidad.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it