MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3166317345 · doi:10.7202/1074701ar

La relation de couple chez les mères filicides est-elle importante ?

2021· article· fr· W3166317345 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Line Laporte, Bernard Poulin, Jacques D. Marleau

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatrie et violence · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Canadian institutionsInstitut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les données sur le statut civil peuvent-elles ne pas être représentatives de la réalité conjugale des femmes filicides ? L’examen de la situation de cohabitation serait-il plus approprié de nos jours que les statuts généralement invoqués dans les écrits sur le sujet ? À partir d’un échantillon québécois constitué de 42 femmes filicides, plusieurs variables ont été comparées entre deux sous-groupes selon la présence ou non d’un conjoint cohabitant avec elles au moment du passage à l’acte. Quelques différences significatives ont été notées et nous ont permis une meilleure compréhension de certains aspects situationnels et dynamiques pour chacun des sous-groupes étudiés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychiatrie et violenceSame topicHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseFrench-language works237,207