MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3166369780 · doi:10.31590/ejosat.873157

Veri Madenciliği İle Türkiye’deki Ve Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerindeki Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Programlarının Karşılaştırılması

2021· article· tr· W3166369780 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Science and Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicQuality and Safety in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using data mining in many areas, it is tried to obtain useful information for people from meaningless data sets. In this study, data mining was used in the education field. This study was a comparison of computer engineering at universities in European Union countries and Turkey intended in the course of classified data mining methods with each other. Erasmus program agreements with 29 pieces of computer engineering university course listings in comparison to the 80 European Union countries with this university computer engineering course listings in Turkey, and these listings have been collected and analyzed. These data obtained were analyzed by Weka platform using Naive Bayes algorithm and J48 decision tree algorithm, which are among data mining classification algorithms. In order to examine the courses, the courses are divided into 9 classes as "Basic Courses, Mathematics Courses, Software Courses, Hardware

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.687
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it