MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3166381500

Repintes y reintegración na “Black Flag” de Ljubo Babić

2020· article· es· W3166381500 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maja Sucevic Miklin

Bibliographic record

VenueGe-conservacion · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesInpaintingPaintingVisual artsComputer scienceImage (mathematics)Artificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolEste articulo presentara la restauracion llevada a cabo a finales de 2017 sobre un oleo llamado “Black Flag”, de Ljubo Babic, que se erige hoy como una de las cinco pinturas mas importantes de la historia del arte moderno croata. La atencion se centrara en intervenciones anteriores, retoques y repintes, que se encontraron en una pintura tan importante, asi como en el complejo proceso de restauracion.Tras una remocion parcial de las intervenciones anteriores, aun quedaron algunas particulas de suciedad incrustadas en la textura. Esta condicion y los efectos de pintura del artista determinaron el proceso de pintura. Se eligio un metodo mimetico en pintura, consistente en un proceso de dos etapas, intermediadas con una aplicacion de barniz: colores gouache para reconstruir la imagen y pigmentos mezclados con balsamo de Canada para finalizar el proceso. Este metodo resulto muy buena reintegracion del retoque y en el aspecto general de la pintura. EnglishThis paper will present the restoration carried out at the end of 2017 on an oil painting called the “Black flag”, by Ljubo Babic, that stands today as one of the five more important paintings in Croatian modern art history. The focus will be on previous interventions – retouches and overpaintings – that were found on such an important painting, as well as the complex process of inpainting. After a partial removal of the previous interventions, some particles of dirt were still left embedded in the texture. This condition and the artist's paint effects determined the inpainting process. A mimetic inpainting method was chosen, consisting into a two stages process, intermediated with a varnish application: gouache colours to reconstruct the image and pigments mixed with Canada balsam to finish the process. This method resulted in a good reintegration of the retouch and in the overall appearance of the painting. portuguesTEste artigo apresentara o restauro realizado no final de 2017 sobre uma pintura a oleo denominada “Black Flag”, de Ljubo Babic, que se destaca hoje como uma das cinco pinturas mais importantes da historia da arte moderna Croata. A atencao recaira sobre as intervencoes anteriores, retoques e repinturas, que foram encontradas nesta importante pintura, bem como o complexo processo de reintegracao.Apos a remocao parcial das intervencoes anteriores, algumas particulas de sujidade permaneceram incrustadas na textura. Essa condicao e os efeitos criados pela pintura do artista determinaram o processo de reintegracao. Optou-se por um metodo de reintegracao mimetico, que consiste num processo de duas etapas, intermediado por uma aplicacao de verniz: cores guache para reconstruir a imagem e pigmentos misturados com balsamo de Canada para finalizar o processo. Este metodo resultou num boa reintegracao do retoque e na aparencia geral da pintura.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGe-conservacionSame topicDigital Media and Visual ArtFrench-language works237,207