Projection-free Graph-based Classifier Learning using Gershgorin Disc Perfect Alignment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In semi-supervised graph-based binary classifier learning, a subset of known labels $\hat{x}_i$ are used to infer unknown labels, assuming that the label signal $\mathbf{x}$ is smooth with respect to a similarity graph specified by a Laplacian matrix. When restricting labels $x_i$ to binary values, the problem is NP-hard. While a conventional semi-definite programming relaxation (SDR) can be solved in polynomial time using, for example, the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), the complexity of projecting a candidate matrix $\mathbf{M}$ onto the positive semi-definite (PSD) cone ($\mathbf{M} \succeq 0$) per iteration remains high. In this paper, leveraging a recent linear algebraic theory called Gershgorin disc perfect alignment (GDPA), we propose a fast projection-free method by solving a sequence of linear programs (LP) instead. Specifically, we first recast the SDR to its dual, where a feasible solution $\mathbf{H} \succeq 0$ is interpreted as a Laplacian matrix corresponding to a balanced signed graph minus the last node. To achieve graph balance, we split the last node into two, each retains the original positive / negative edges, resulting in a new Laplacian $\bar{\mathbf{H}}$. We repose the SDR dual for solution $\bar{\mathbf{H}}$, then replace the PSD cone constraint $\bar{\mathbf{H}} \succeq 0$ with linear constraints derived from GDPA -- sufficient conditions to ensure $\bar{\mathbf{H}}$ is PSD -- so that the optimization becomes an LP per iteration. Finally, we extract predicted labels from converged solution $\bar{\mathbf{H}}$. Experiments show that our algorithm enjoyed a $28\times$ speedup over the next fastest scheme while achieving comparable label prediction performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".