Compositional and Functional Microbiome Variation Between Tubes of an Intertidal Polychaete and Surrounding Marine Sediment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The decorator worm Diopatra cuprea , a tube-forming marine polychaete common to intertidal and shallow subtidal waters, modifies habitats it occupies through microreef construction and algal gardening. While several studies have demonstrated that decorator worm tubes are hotspots of biogeochemical activity (i.e., nitrogen and sulfur cycling), it is still largely unclear whether the tube microbiome differs compositionally from the surrounding sediment and what distinct functional processes tube microbiomes may have. To address these unknowns, this study analyzed the bacterial communities of D. cuprea tubes and surrounding sediments using high-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Tubes and sediments were sampled at three sites along an anthropogenic stress gradient within the Newport River Estuary to also assess geographic variation of tube microbiomes and the possible influence of human disturbance. We found a clear distinction in the microbial community composition and diversity between tubes and surrounding sediment. Tube microbiomes were significantly enriched for the phyla Bacteriodetes, Actinobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Deferribacteres, Latescibacteria, and Lentisphaerae. Chloroplast sequences of macroalgae and grass species were consistently abundant in tubes and nearly absent in surrounding sediment. Functional annotation of prokaryotic taxa (FAPROTAX)-based functional predictions suggested that tube microbiomes have higher potentials for aerobic chemoheterotrophy, sulfur compound respiration, nitrate reduction, methylotrophy, and hydrocarbon degradation than surrounding sediments. Tube microbiomes vary across sites, though dissimilarity is comparatively low compared to tube-to-sediment differences. Contrary to our hypothesis, the tubes at the most highly impacted site had the highest microbial diversity [i.e., amplicon sequence variant (ASV) richness and Shannon’s diversity], yet tubes from the medium impacted site actually had the lowest microbial diversity. Our findings show that D. cuprea tubes support a microbiome that is significantly distinct in composition and function from the surrounding sediment. Diopatra cuprea tubes appear to create unique microhabitats that facilitate numerous microbially-mediated biogeochemical processes in the marine benthic environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".