MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The effects of contractile activity on mitochondrial adaptations in PGC‐1alpha‐deficient muscle cells

2010· article· en· W3166451295 on OpenAlexaff
Giulia Uguccioni, David A. Hood

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTFAMMitochondrial biogenesisSkeletal muscleCoactivatorMitochondrionCell biologyBiologyMyogenesisNRF1Mitochondrial DNAPhosphorylationMediatorChemistryEndocrinologyBiochemistryTranscription factorGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PGC‐1α is a well established mediator of mitochondrial content and function in skeletal muscle. However, the essentiality of the coactivator for mitochondrial biogenesis (MB) in response to chronic contractile activity (CCA) is still in question. Thus, we depleted skeletal muscle C2C12 cells of PGC‐1α using siRNA, then stimulated the myotubes to induced MB. A 60% reduction in PGC‐1α using siRNA resulted in a compensatory increase in AMPK phosphorylation, but had no effect on the mRNA expression of PGC‐1β, PRC, NRF‐1/2 or YY1, proteins that may have served to compensate for low PGC‐1α levels. In response to CCA, we found that a normal induction of PGC‐1α in response to CCA was required to observe the typical changes in MB, as revealed by attenuated increases in COX activity (p<0.05) and mitochondrial immunofluorescence. Decreased levels of PGC‐1α also reduced the CCA‐evoked increases in COXIV. However, PGC‐1α was not necessary for the CCA‐induced changes of all mitochondrial proteins since Tfam and cytochrome c displayed normal increases, regardless of attenuated PGC‐1α levels. Thus, PGC‐1α is necessary for the normal induction of mitochondrial biogenesis, and the coactivator likely functions with parallel pathways to mediate increases in mitochondrial proteins with CCA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→