Half the V by 120: A practical approach to the prevention of the dialysis disequilibrium syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The dialysis disequilibrium syndrome (DDS) results from osmotic shifts between the blood and the brain compartments. Patients at risk for DDS include those with very elevated blood urea nitrogen, concomitant hypernatremia, metabolic acidosis, and low total body water volumes. By understanding the underlying pathophysiology and applying urea kinetic modeling, it is possible to avoid the occurrence of this disorder. A urea reduction ratio (URR) of no more than 40%–45% over 2 h is recommended for the initial hemodialysis treatment. The relationship between the URR and Kt/V is useful when trying to model the dialysis treatment to a specific URR target. A simplified relationship between Kt/V and URR is provided by the equation: Kt/V = −ln (1 − URR). A URR of 40% is roughly equivalent to a Kt/V of 0.5. The required dialyzer urea clearance to achieve this goal URR in a 120‐min treatment can simply be calculated by dividing half the patient's volume of distribution of urea by 120. The blood flow rate and dialyzer mass transfer coefficient (K0A) required to achieve this clearance can then be plotted on a nomogram. Other methods to reduce the risk of DDS are reviewed, including the use of continuous renal replacement therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".