Les céramiques en usage à Paris et dans les grandes villes côtières françaises au XVIe et au début du XVIIe siècle : contribution à l’identification des productions exportées sur les sites coloniaux nord-américains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le développement des fouilles, en particulier préventives, en France ces vingt dernières années, a permis la mise au jour d’importantes collections de céramiques provenant de contextes stratifiés très bien datés de l’époque moderne. Le but de cet article est de présenter d’une manière synthétique le mobilier céramique en usage dans certaines régions du Centre et de l’Ouest de la France, de la Normandie à l’Aquitaine, en passant par Paris, à l’époque des premiers voyages transatlantiques. On s’attachera à mettre en évidence les principaux groupes de céramiques qui circulaient à longue distance et qui jouissaient donc d’un certain prestige. Cette contribution vise à éclairer d’une autre manière les premières découvertes de céramiques françaises au XVIe siècle et dans les premières décennies du XVIIe siècle sur les sites coloniaux nord-américains (postes de traite, forts, sites de pêche, épaves).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".