MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3166557361

Антропологические аспекты современного танца. Беседы с Акрамом Кханом о судьбе, истоках вдохновения и сценическом повествовании : DOI: 10.33876/2311-0546/2021-54-2/157-176

2021· article· ru· W3166557361 on OpenAlex
Светлана Рыжакова

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник антропологии (Herald of Anthropology) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceHomelandEthnic groupModernityHistoryPostmodernismBiographyAnthropologyArtVisual artsLiteratureSociologyArt historyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contemporary dance is a global phenomenon, but national and ethnic aspects are regularly manifested both in the content and in the form of performances, and in artists’ life-stories. Akram Khan is one of the most famous dancers and choreographers of our time. Member of the Order of the British Empire for Dance Merit since 2005, he is the creator of numerous ballets performed by various troupes and the author and performer of solo programs. Each of his performances is an event that offers a new vision of both the form and the content of contemporary dance. This essay is based on personal conversations of Svetlana Ryzhakova with Akram Khan in 2017 and 2019, as well as observations and analysis of his family history, career and artistic activity. Akram Khan was born and raised in England, but his parents are migrants from Bangladesh, a Muslim, although a very Westernized family. Problems of ethnic and cultural identity, personal attitudes towards language and the body, historical memory, social tension, “friends and foes”, homeland, as well as how modernity can and should be reflected on stage formed the basis of our conversations and reasoning of Akram Khan. For Citation: Ryzhakova, S. 2021. Anthropological aspects of contemporary dance. Conversations with Akram Khan on fate, inspiration and stage narration. Herald of Anthropology (Vestnik Antropologii) 2: 157–176. References Banes, Sally. 2021. Terpsikhora v krossovkakh. Tanets postmodern [Terpsichore in sneakers. Postmodern dance]. Moscow: OOO “Art Guide” (Artguide Editions)]. Grem, Marta. 2020. Pamyat' krovi. Avtobiografiya [Memory of blood. Autobiography]. Moscow: OOO “Art Guide” (Artguide Editions). Kanningem, Mers. 2019. «Gladkiy, potomu chto nerovnyy…» [“Smooth because uneven ...”], edited by Jacqueline Leshev. Moscow: Guide, Garage Museum of Contemporary Art. Klimenkhaga, Royd. 2021. Pina Baush. Obnazheniye telesnogo prisutstviya [Pina Bausch. Exposure of bodily presence]. Moscow: OOO Art Guide (Artguide Editions). Ryzhakova S.I. 2020. Akram Kkhan: o zhizni, tantse i istoriyakh [Akram Khan: about life, dance and stories]. Screen and stage 18, September 29. Adshead-Lansdale, J. (ed.) 1999. Dancing Texts: Intertextuality in Interpretation. London: Dance Books. Bohm-Duchen, Ben. 2018. Home was in my Body https://www.akramkhancompany.net/explore-archive/home-was-in-my-body/ (access: 12.04.2021). Devidayal, Namita. 2018. The Six String of Vilayat Khan. Chennai: Context, Westland Publication Private Limited. Foster, Susan Leigh, (ed.). 2009. Worlding Dance. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 209 p. Hind, John. Akram Khan: “My father hated my waitering – how I’d prance around”. 17.09.2017. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/sep/17/akram-khan-dancer-choreographer-life-on-a-plate (access: 12.04.2021). Kealiinohomoku, Joann. 1983. An anthropologist looks at ballet as a form of ethnic dance (1970). Copeland, Robert and Marshall, Cohen. What is Dance? Readings in Theory and Criticism, 533–549. Oxford University: Oxford University Press. Partsch-Bergsohn I., Bergsohn H. 2003. The Makers of Modern Dance in Germany: Rudolf Laban, Mary Wigman, Kurt Jooss. Highstown, N.J.: Princeton Book Company. Prickett, Stacey. 2011. Akram Khan. Fifty Contemporary Choreographers. 2 ed., edited by Marth Bremser and Lorna Sanders. N.Y.: Routledge. Sanders, L. 2003. Choreographers Today: Akram Khan. Dancing Times. May, 17–23. Sanders, L. 2004. Akram Khan’s Rush: Creative Insights. Alton: Dance Books. Sanders, L. 2008. Akram Khan’s ma (2004): An Essay in Hybridisation and Productive Ambiguity, Lansdale J. (eds). Decentring Dancing Texts. Palgrave Macmillan, London. Sparshott, F. 1995. A Measured Pace: Toward a Philosophical Understanding of the Arts of Dance. Toronto, Buffalo and London: University of Toronto Press. Swaminathnan, Chitra. 2015. Dancer-choreographer Akram Khan on movement, his muse. The Hindu. 23.09.2015. Vasudewan, Preeti with Akram Khan. 2002. Clarity within Chaos. Dance Theatre Journal 18 (1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.009
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3160.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it