Characterization and differentiation of quinoa seed proteomes by label-free mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quinoa seed proteins are of prime importance in human nutrition and in plant breeding for cultivar identification and improvement. In this study, proteins from seeds of black, red, white quinoa from Peru and white quinoa from Bolivia (also known as royal) were extracted, digested and analyzed by nano-liquid chromatography coupled to Orbitrap tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The raw mass spectra data were processed for identification and label-free quantification (LFQ) using MaxQuant/Andromeda against a specific quinoa database from The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). In total, 1,211 quinoa proteins (85 were uncharacterized) were identified. Inspection and visualization using Venn diagrams, heat maps and Gene Ontology (GO) graphs revealed proteome similarities and differences between the four varieties. The presented data provides the most comprehensive experimental quinoa seed proteome map existing to date in the literature, as a starting point for more specific characterization and nutritional studies of quinoa and quinoa-containing foodstuff.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it