MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3166603299 · doi:10.3917/entin.047.0076

Réseaux sociaux et régulation des émotions : le cas de LiveMentor

2021· article· fr· W3166603299 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEntreprendre & Innover · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)ArtMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lors du premier confinement en 2020, LiveMentor, jeune entreprise de formation et d’accompagnement d’entrepreneurs en ligne a lancé une émission quotidienne sur Facebook, puis organisé une enquête pour connaître le ressenti et les modalités de soutien recherchées par ses membres. Ayant eu accès aux 131 réponses récoltées, nous avons mené une analyse interprétative pour comprendre comment les entrepreneurs ont utilisé ce réseau social pour réguler leurs émotions face au choc de la crise de la Covid. Cette étude propose quelques enseignements concernant le profil de ces entrepreneurs et la nature des ressources qui ont pu les aider. Elle démontre l’intérêt de poursuivre des recherches sur le sujet, pour l’instant inexploré.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it