MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3166638349 · doi:10.4000/culturemusees.6124

La collection a-t-elle un avenir au sein du musée ?

2021· article· fr· W3166638349 on OpenAlex
François Mairesse

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCulture & Musées · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMuseums and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article étudie les conséquences possibles de l’évolution actuelle du phénomène muséal sur la place des collections au sein du musée. La mondialisation, le développement du numérique, ainsi que l’influence de nouveaux courants de pensée, comme le postcolonialisme, pourraient transformer la manière de définir le musée. Cette transformation s’inscrit cependant dans une évolution plus globale, qui se poursuit depuis les années 1970. L’auteur évoque les principaux jalons qui ont conduit les musées à privilégier le public sur la gestion des collections, mais aussi l’émergence de l’autonomie progressive des réserves au sein du système muséal. Ce principe le conduit à envisager de manière conjointe l’évolution des réserves et celle des lieux d’exposition, à la lumière d’autres tendances pouvant être observées au sein du système économique mondial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it