Deep Active Learning Approach to Adaptive Beamforming for mmWave Initial Alignment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a deep learning approach to the adaptive and sequential beamforming design problem for the initial access phase in a mmWave environment with a single-path channel. For a single-user scenario where the problem is equivalent to designing the sequence of sensing beamformers to learn the angle of arrival (AoA) of the dominant path, we propose a novel deep neural network (DNN) that designs the adaptive sensing vectors sequentially based on the available information so far at the base station (BS). By recognizing that the AoA posterior distribution is a sufficient statistic for solving the initial access problem, we use the posterior distribution as the input to the proposed DNN for designing the adaptive sensing strategy. However, computing the posterior distribution can be computationally challenging when the channel fading coefficient is unknown. To address this issue, this paper proposes to use an estimate of the fading coefficient to compute an approximation of the posterior distribution. Further, this paper shows that the proposed DNN can deal with practical beamforming constraints such as the constant modulus constraint. Numerical results demonstrate that compared to the existing adaptive and non-adaptive beamforming schemes, the proposed DNN-based adaptive sensing strategy achieves a significantly better AoA acquisition performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it