MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3166747813 · doi:10.7202/1077975ar

Les enseignants formés à l’étranger dans les écoles montréalaises : des interactions qui façonnent de nouvelles représentations opératoires

2021· article· fr· W3166747813 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Joëlle Morrissette, Sébastien Arcand, Ben Diéhdiou, Saïdou Sèguéda

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l éducation de McGill · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Education and Multiculturalism
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalHEC MontréalUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

De nombreux enseignants oeuvrent dans des contextes nationaux distincts de leur lieu de formation. La recherche a jusqu’ici négligé de regarder la part jouée par leurs nouveaux partenaires de travail dans leur (re)socialisation à la profession. Cette recherche éclaire comment les interactions au travail sont le moteur de l’ajustement du savoir enseigner d’enseignants formés à l’étranger intégrant les écoles montréalaises. Les résultats montrent que les interactions les amènent à changer leurs représentations de l’éducation, des rapports au sein de la communauté éducative et de la profession enseignante, jusqu’à ce que celles-ci soient viables en contexte. Il en ressort que leurs divers partenaires de travail jouent un rôle différencié dans la socialisation qui contribue à la reproduction des conventions du métier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.239
Threshold uncertainty score0.481

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0160.010
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.342
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.118 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l éducation de McGillSame topicGlobal Education and MulticulturalismFrench-language works237,207