Evolution of discharge and runner rotation speed along no-load curves of Francis turbines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In hydraulic turbines, no-load operation is among the most damaging conditions since unextracted swirl leads to the creation of highly energetic flow structures causing high pressure and strain fluctuations on the turbine components. To date, experimental and numerical studies typically focus on flow characteristics for a specific no-load condition of a specific turbine. However, for a given turbine, a unique no-load condition exists for every single guide vane opening, forming what is called a no-load curve. Few studies describe the evolution of engineering quantities such as discharge and speed along the no-load curve even if those quantities may highlight trends in no-load behavior that can be used to tailor numerical simulations according to specific flow conditions. This paper presents results from a project underway at Andritz Hydro Canada Inc., in collaboration with Université Laval, to analyze the extensive database of experimental no-load tests performed at model scale in order to identify the evolution of discharge and runner rotation speed following the guide vane opening.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".