MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3166799205 · doi:10.5430/air.v10n1p64

Workplace and human resource safety monitoring using internet of things

2021· article· en· W3166799205 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Adewole David Bamidele, Oluwole Charles Akinyokun

Bibliographic record

VenueArtificial Intelligence Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT-based Smart Home Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadio-frequency identificationComputer securityInternet of ThingsGlobal Positioning SystemMicrocontrollerArduinoWirelessComputer scienceWearable computerResource (disambiguation)The InternetIdentification (biology)TelecommunicationsEmbedded systemWorld Wide WebComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The subject of safety and security of Human Resource (HR) of corporate organizations is a major concern due to the sudden rise in crimes, accidents and various hazards associated with workplaces and the society in recent times. This paper proposes a system for monitoring HR activities and movements in the workplace in real time. The proposed system employs the use of Internet of Things (IoT) wearable devices which are made up of Arduino Uno microcontroller, wireless Radio Frequency Sensors (RFS), Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags/readers and Global Positioning System (GPS) modules. The system aims at tracking, locating and keeping the log of the activities and movements of employees at any instant thereby providing information required by employers and security agencies to ensure timely intervention in case of emergency and urgent evacuation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArtificial Intelligence ResearchSame topicIoT-based Smart Home SystemsFrench-language works237,207