Bibliographic record
Abstract
We showed that deep breathing and voluntary hand movements are able to effectively and timely alter visual bistable perception, see reference 1 and 2. Deep breathing and voluntary hand movements require cognitive control, however, deep breathing causes stable respiratory sinus arrythmia (RSA). We decided to achieve this study because we have previously claimed that the RSA process is the governor of the visual motion rivalry through the deep breathing, see reference 1. We therefore suspect whether every kind of volitional switching to visual motion rivalry has correlation to the heart rate. Expectedly, we found that deep inhalation which is associated with the perception of the actual visual martial is able to increase the heart rate; and deep expiration which is correlated to the perception of motion reversals is able to decrease the heart rate. Astoundingly, for the voluntary switching through the hand movements, we found that when the human subjects move a pen in harmony with the actual physical direction which results in the perception of the original materials of the visual stimulus; the heart rate is increased. Illusory motion reversals, which appears when the pen is moved in the opposite direction of the actual motion, are correlated to heart rate deceleration!
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".