Molecular genetic diversity and population structure analyses of rutabaga accessions from Nordic countries as revealed by single nucleotide polymorphism markers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Rutabaga or swede (Brassica napus ssp. napobrassica (L.) Hanelt) varies in root and leaf shape and colour, flesh colour, foliage growth habits, maturity date, seed quality parameters, disease resistance and other traits. Despite these morphological differences, no in-depth molecular analyses of genetic diversity have been conducted in this crop. Understanding this diversity is important for conservation and broadening the use of this resource. Results This study investigated the genetic diversity within and among 124 rutabaga accessions from five Nordic countries (Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Iceland) using a 15 K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) Brassica array. After excluding markers that did not amplify genomic DNA, monomorphic and low coverage site markers, the accessions were analyzedwith 6861 SNP markers. Allelic frequency statistics, including polymorphism information content (PIC), minor allele frequency (MAF) and mean expected heterozygosity ( $$ \overline{H} $$ H ¯ e) and population differentiation statistics such as Wright’s F-statistics (FST) and analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) indicated that the rutabaga accessions from Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark were not genetically different from each other. In contrast, accessions from these countries were significantly different from the accessions from Iceland (P < 0.05). Bayesian analysis with the software STRUCTURE placed 66.9% of the rutabaga accessions into three to four clusters, while the remaining 33.1% constituted admixtures. Three multivariate analyses: principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) and neighbour-joining (NJ) clustering methods grouped the 124 accessions into four to six subgroups. Conclusion Overall, the correlation of the accessions with their geographic origin was very low, except for the accessions from Iceland. Thus, Icelandic rutabaga accessions can offer valuable germplasm for crop improvement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".