MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3166980938 · doi:10.23977/jemm.2021.060102

Design of all-around automatic integrated rail cleaning vehicle

2021· article· en· W3166980938 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yizhi Liu, Xu Li, Xueyou Ren, Yonghai He, Heqing Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering Mechanics and Machinery · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRailway Engineering and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designEngineeringAutomotive engineeringReliability (semiconductor)Automatic controlWorkloadControl (management)Computer scienceControl engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the vigorous development of rail construction in China, the workload of rail cleaning increases rapidly. The use of automatic machinery for rail cleaning will become a trend. The market needs to meet the needs of rail cleaning vehicles’ high reliability and high efficiency. Based on the market demand, this paper designed and developed a high-efficiency, energy-saving, cost-effective rail cleaning equipment. The cleaning operation vehicle integrates the function of pollution absorption, cleaning and high-pressure water. It adopts advanced technology such as artificial intelligence and automatic control system to realize the functions of automatic train operation, route planning, operation state monitoring, water level control, fault detection, garbage classification, operation and maintenance modular management, etc. At the same time, for the high humidity working environment, the function of waterproof has been taken into consideration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering Mechanics and MachinerySame topicRailway Engineering and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207