MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adaptive Minimization of Direct Sunlight Noise on V2V-VLC Receivers

2021· article· en· W3166982373 on OpenAlexaff
Kandasamy Illanko, Xavier Fernando

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisible light communicationSunlightMinificationComputer scienceNoise (video)Electronic engineeringPhysicsLight-emitting diodeOptoelectronicsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shot noise due to direct sunlight is the major cause of SNR degradation in vehicle to vehicle visible light communications (V2V-VLC) outdoors. This shot noise can be simply reduced by the receiver ‘looking away’ from the sun rays. However, this has to be done without reducing the received optical signal power, which is a 3-D tracking problem, where both transmitter and receiver are moving. This paper analyzes the resulting optimization problem and finds the optimal angle at which the instantaneous SNR is maximized. This depends on the incident angle of the optical signal as well as the incident angle of the sunlight. Note, the mobility adds random additive noise in addition to rapid angle variations. The paper uses an extended- Kalman filter to minimize the error and possible drift in the optimal angle in the presence of noisy measurements. This results in an adaptive SNR optimization system for real-time vehicle to vehicle visible light communications. We have also presented the analytical solution to the SNR optimization problem. Simulation results, on a curved freeway on a bright sunny day, demonstrate close matching between the actual optimal SNR and that achieved by the extended-Kalman filter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207