The Real Options to Technology Management: Strategic Options for 3G Wireless Network Architecture and Technologies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing demands for high-quality multimedia services have challenged the wireless industry to rapidly develop wireless network architecture and technologies. These demands have led wireless service providers to struggle with the current network migration dilemma of how to best deliver high-quality multimedia services. Currently, there are many alternative wireless network technologies, such as TDMA, GSM, GPRS, EDGE, WCDMA, cdma2000, etc. These wireless technology choices require close examination when making strategic decisions involving network evolution.This study assesses the technology options for wireless networks to establish next generation networks (i.e., 3G), based on the real options approach (ROA), and discusses wireless network operators¡¯ technology migration strategies. The goal of this study is to develop a theoretical framework for wireless network operators to support their strategic decision-making process when considering technology choices. The study begins by tracing the evolution of technologies in wireless networks to place them in the proper context, and continues by developing the strategic technology option model (STOM) using ROA as an assessment tool. Finally, STOM is applied to the world and US wireless industries for the formulation of technology migration strategies. Consequently, this study will help wireless network service providers make strategic decisions when upgrading or migrating towards the next generation network architecture by showing the possible network migration paths and their relative value. Through this study, network operators can begin to think in terms of the available network options and to maximize overall gain in networks. Since the migration issues concerning the next generation wireless network architecture and technologies remain the subject of debate, with no substantial implementation in progress now, this study will help the industry to decide where best to focus its efforts and can be expanded for further research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".