MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3167163652

재활병원에 입원한 척수손상환자들의 작업수행 문제들과 시간사용에 관한 연구

2008· article· ko· W3167163652 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
홍승표

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy · 2008
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Therapy Practice and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBarthel indexMedicinePsychologyPhysical therapyActivities of daily living
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

목적 : 이 연구는 재활병원에서 입원치료를 받고 있는 척수손상환자를 대상으로 작업수행의 영역에서의 문제점을 명시하고, 작업수행의 수준, 수행도 및 만족도와 영역별 시간사용의 관련성을 분석하고자 하였다. 연구방법 : 연구대상은 재활병원에 입원하여 치료를 받고 있는 척수손상환자 19명을 대상으로 하였다. 일상생활활동은 MBI(Modified Barthel Index), 작업수행에서의 문제는 COPM(Canadian Occupational Performance Measure)을 통하여 조사하였고, 시간 사용을 기준으로 활동 배치를 조사하기 위해 30분 단위로 활동을 배치하는 타임테이블을 사용하였다. 조사기간은 2008년 7월 14일에서 7월 16일까지였다. 결과 : 전체 작업수행의 문제는 총 84건이었으며, 자조활동에 대한 문제가 71.4%로 가장 많았다. MBI 점수가 높을수록 자조활동 시간사용은 높았고, 여가활동 시간사용은 낮았다(p<.05). 전체 여가활동 중 정적 여가활동에 대한 시간사용이 높았다. 결론 : 이 연구결과를 통하여 척수손상환자에게 필요한 문제의 우선순위가 다양하고, 작업수행 영역별 시간사용이 불균형이 심한 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 그러므로 척수손상환자에 대한 작업치료 중재 시 우선순위를 고려한 목표설정이 필요하고, 효율적인 시간관리를 위한 작업치료 중재가 필요함을 알 수 있었다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.533
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.273
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Korean Society of Occupational TherapySame topicOccupational Therapy Practice and ResearchFrench-language works237,207