MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Effects of Hypoxia‐Induced Central Sleep Apnea on Splenic Contraction and Oxygen Carrying Capacity

2021· article· en· W3167230304 on OpenAlexaff
Pontus Holmström, Jordan D. Bird, Scott F. Thrall, Alexandra Skalk, Britta R. M. Byman, Brandon Pentz, Anthony L. Marullo, Nicholas Jendzjowsky, Richard J. A. Wilson, Erika Schagatay, Trevor A. Day

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHypoxia (environmental)Intermittent hypoxiaAnesthesiaEffects of high altitude on humansPolysomnographySleep apneaCentral sleep apneaApneaBlood volumeCardiologyInternal medicineObstructive sleep apneaOxygenChemistryAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central sleep apnea (CSA) begins developing above 3000m due to respiratory control system instability in hypoxia, and represents a series of short‐duration, end‐expiratory apneas during sleep. Previous studies demonstrate that splenic contraction is induced by both sustained hypoxia and apnea, ejecting of a store of red blood cells (RBCs) into the systemic circulation, with associated elevations in [hemoglobin] ([Hb]) and arterial oxygen content (CaO 2 ). Therefore, we aimed to assess whether the apneas associated with CSA in the context of high altitude ascent elicit splenic contraction, contributing to hematological acclimatization early in ascent to high altitude. We recruited two groups of participants for two protocols, one lab‐based (1045m; Part A) and one during rapid ascent and residence at high altitude (3800m; Part B). For Part A, 15 participants (6 females) performed five intermittent voluntary end‐expiratory apneas (15‐sec; separated by 1‐min) in normobaric hypoxia (F I O 2 0.15‐0.16) in a seated position. Splenic volume was measured via ultrasonography prior to and immediately following apneas. Capillary blood samples for [Hb] and peripheral pulse oximetry (SpO 2 ) was collected before and immediately following apneas. For Part B, 21 participants (8 females) ascended rapidly by car to 3800m over 5‐6 hours, and CSA was assessed via portable polysomnography on night two, with capillary [Hb] samples and SpO 2 collected before sleep (pm) and after waking (am). In Part A, splenic volume decreased from normoxia (201±83 mL) to hypoxia (172±62 mL; Δ29±30 mL, 95% CI [11.7–46.1 mL], P=0.003), and decreased further following apneas (151±61 mL, Δ21±17 mL, 95% CI [5.3–36.4], P=0.005) compared to hypoxia baseline. However, [Hb] and CaO 2 were unchanged following apneas. At 3800m, the apnea‐hypopnea index increased from 3.4±3.5 before ascent (1045m) to 12.3±14.5 events/hour at 3800m (P=0.002), suggesting CSA. [Hb] was elevated from 143±11 g L ‐1 (night 2) to 152±12 g L ‐1 (morning 3; Δ9±15 g L ‐1 , 95% CI [2.6–16.2 g L ‐1 ] P=0.01), which resulted in increases in CaO 2 from 16.9±1.3 to 18.5±1.5 ml dl ‐1 (Δ1.6±2 ml dl ‐1 , 95% CI [0.6–2.6 ml dl ‐1 ], P=0.003). Our data suggest that CSA‐mediated intermittent apneas in the context of early high altitude ascent results in functional splenic contraction and ejection of RBCs into the systemic circulation, increasing [Hb] and CaO 2 . This is the first demonstration that CSA‐induced splenic contraction may contribute to hematological acclimatization and increased oxygen carrying capacity early in ascent to high altitude, before the known time‐course of erythropoietin‐induced increases in [Hb] with sustained high altitude exposure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia→French-language works237,207→