MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Impact of the Mediterranean diet and weight loss on plasma cell adhesion molecule concentrations in men with the metabolic syndrome

2010· article· en· W3167355435 on OpenAlexaff
Caroline Richard, Charles Couillard, Marie‐Michelle Royer, Sophie Desroches, Patrick Couture, Benoı̂t Lamarche

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeight lossMediterranean dietMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyAnimal scienceObesityBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examined the impact of the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) consumed under controlled feeding conditions, with and without weight loss, on plasma cell adhesion molecule (CAM) concentrations in men with the metabolic syndrome (MS). Twenty‐six men (age: 24–62 years) with the MS first consumed a control Western‐type diet for 5 weeks followed by a 5‐week MedDiet, both under weight‐maintaining isocaloric feeding conditions. They then underwent a 20‐week caloric restriction phase that led to a 10.2 ± 2.9% reduction in body weight (P <0.01), followed by the consumption of an isocaloric MedDiet for 5 weeks. All foods including red wine were provided during the isocaloric phases of the study. Although there was no change in any of the vascular CAM after the MedDiet without weight loss, participants with high E‐selectin at baseline (above median, 36.8 ng/mL) showed greater reductions in plasma E‐selectin levels on the MedDiet without weigh loss than those with low plasma E‐selectin at baseline (P for interaction <0.01). The MedDiet combined with weight loss reduced plasma intercellular CAM concentrations by 10.9% (P <0.01) compared with the control diet and by 6.8% (P =0.068) compared with the MedDiet without weight loss. These data suggest that weight loss may be required for the MedDiet to improve CAM levels in men with the MS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicDiabetes Treatment and Management→French-language works237,207→