MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3167399595 · doi:10.1101/2021.05.27.445966

Predictive Modeling of <i>Pseudomonas syringae</i> Virulence on Bean using Gradient Boosted Decision Trees

2021· preprint· en· W3167399595 on OpenAlexaff
Renan N. D. Almeida, Michael E. Greenberg, Cedoljub Bundalovic-Torma, Alexandre Martel, Pauline W. Wang, Maggie A. Middleton, Syama Chatterton, Darrell Desveaux, David S. Guttman

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathovarPseudomonas syringaeVirulencePhaseolusBiologyHost (biology)MicrobiologyPathogenPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonadaceaeBacteriaGeneticsBotanyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Pseudomonas syringae is a genetically diverse bacterial species complex responsible for numerous agronomically important crop diseases. Individual P. syringae isolates are typically given pathovar designations based on their host of isolation and the associated disease symptoms, and these pathovar designations are often assumed to reflect host specificity although this assumption has rarely been rigorously tested. Here we developed a rapid seed infection assay to measure the virulence of 121 diverse P. syringae isolates on common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ). This collection includes P. syringae phylogroup 2 (PG2) bean isolates (pathovar syringae ) that cause bacterial spot disease and P. syringae phylogroup 3 (PG3) bean isolates (pathovar phaseolicola ) that cause the more serious halo blight disease. We found that bean isolates in general were significantly more virulent on bean than non-bean isolates and observed no significant virulence difference between the PG2 and PG3 bean isolates. However, when we compared virulence within PGs we found that PG3 bean isolates were significantly more virulent than PG3 non-bean isolates, while there was no significant difference in virulence between PG2 bean and non-bean isolates. These results indicate that PG3 strains have a higher level of host specificity than PG2 strains. We then employed machine learning to investigate if we could use genomic data to predict virulence on bean. We used gradient boosted decision trees to model the virulence using whole genome kmers, type III secreted effector kmers, and the presence/absence of type III effectors and phytotoxins. Our model performed best using whole genome data and was able to predict virulence with high accuracy (mean absolute error = 0.05). Finally, we functionally validated the model by predicting virulence for 16 strains and found that 15 (94%) had virulence levels within the bounds of estimated predictions. This study demonstrates the power of machine learning for predicting host specific adaptation and strengthens the hypothesis that P. syringae PG2 strains have evolved a different lifestyle than other P. syringae strains. AUTHOR SUMMARY Pseudomonas syringae is a genetically diverse Gammaproteobacterial species complex responsible for numerous agronomically important crop diseases. Strains in the P. syringae species complex are frequently categorized into pathovars depending on pathogenic characteristics such as host of isolation and disease symptoms. Common bean pathogens from P. syringae are known to cause two major diseases: the halo blight disease, which is characterized by large necrotic lesions surrounded by a chlorotic zone or halo of yellow tissue; and the bacterial spot disease, which is characterized by brown leaf spots. While halo blight can cause serious crop losses, bacterial spot disease is generally of minor agronomic concern. The application of statistical genetic and machine learning approaches to genomic data has greatly increased our power to identify genes underlying traits of interest, such as host specificity. Machine learning models can be used to predict outcomes from new samples or to identify the genetic feature(s) that carry the most importance when predicting a particular phenotype. Here, we implemented a rapid method for screening a proxy of virulence for P. syringae isolates on common bean, and used this screen to assess virulence of P. syringae strains on bean. We found that halo blight pathogens display a stronger degree of host specificity compared to brown spot pathogens, and that genomic kmers and virulence factors can be used to predict the virulence of P. syringae isolates on bean using machine learning models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesFrench-language works237,207