MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3167446908 · doi:10.1037/spy0000269

Prolonged cognitive activity increases perception of fatigue but does not influence perception of effort, affective valence, or performance during subsequent isometric endurance exercise.

2021· article· en· W3167446908 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSport Exercise and Performance Psychology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports Performance and Training
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsometric exercisePerceptionValence (chemistry)PsychologyCognitionAudiologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyMedicinePsychiatryPhysicsNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Performance of a cognitively demanding task has previously been reported to impair subsequent physical endurance performance, an effect attributed to sensory processes influencing the perceived effort required to maintain performance. However, there is uncertainty regarding the robustness of these performance effects and their putative mechanisms. The present study examined two hypotheses: (a) that prior cognitive activity impairs subsequent physical endurance performance and (b) that the perception of fatigue arising from sustained cognitive performance is associated with the level of effort and affective valence reported during a subsequent physical endurance task. Eighteen participants completed a high (HIGH; a modified version of the Stroop task) and low (LOW; watching a documentary) cognitively demanding task before performing an exhaustive, submaximal (20% maximal voluntary contraction, MVC) isometric contraction of the right knee extensor muscles. The perception of fatigue was elevated and cognitive task accuracy reduced in the HIGH condition. However, physical endurance performance, perception of effort, and affective valence reported during the physical endurance task were not affected. In the HIGH condition, the perceptions of effort and affect were related to endurance time, while significant correlations were found between perceptions of fatigue and both perceived effort and affective valence when assessed across both conditions. The findings indicate that performing a demanding cognitive task does not impair subsequent physical endurance performance nor influence perceived effort and affective valence during a submaximal isometric contraction performed to task failure. The observed relationships offer some support to the idea that fatigue perception may influence affective valence and effort perception. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it