MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3167450714 · doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.116

Indonesia's Role in Fulfilling the Right to Education Elementary and Intermediate in Border Areas

2021· article· en· W3167450714 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Endah Rantau Itasari, Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku, Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini, Elly Kristiani Purwendah, Levina Yustitianingtyas, Francisca Romana Harjiyatni, I Gusti Made Arya Suta Wirawan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Criminology and Sociology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Social Justice Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState (computer science)Competence (human resources)PoliticsCurriculumOrder (exchange)Primary educationPolitical scienceSchool educationEconomic growthSociologyBusinessPedagogyPsychologyLawEconomicsSocial psychologyFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of the state in carrying out educational development and in order to fulfill the right to education, especially primary and secondary education in border areas must be further enhanced. The state must be present among school-age children in border areas by manifesting itself in the form of appropriate and representative school buildings. The state must exist in the form of adequate educational support facilities. The state must be present in the form of teachers and education personnel who are sufficient in number and have competence. The state must be present in the form of budget politics that supports education development in border areas. The state must also be present in a curriculum that suits the needs of school-age children in border areas as well as enhances their national insight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Criminology and SociologySame topicLegal and Social Justice StudiesFrench-language works237,207