Gradient-Free Neural Network Training via Synaptic-Level Reinforcement Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An ongoing challenge in neural information processing is the following question: how do neurons adjust their connectivity to improve network-level task performance over time (i.e., actualize learning)? It is widely believed that there is a consistent, synaptic-level learning mechanism in specific brain regions, such as the basal ganglia, that actualizes learning. However, the exact nature of this mechanism remains unclear. Here, we investigate the use of universal synaptic-level algorithms in training connectionist models. Specifically, we propose an algorithm based on reinforcement learning (RL) to generate and apply a simple biologically-inspired synaptic-level learning policy for neural networks. In this algorithm, the action space for each synapse in the network consists of a small increase, decrease, or null action on the connection strength. To test our algorithm, we applied it to a multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network model. This algorithm yields a static synaptic learning policy that enables the simultaneous training of over 20,000 parameters (i.e., synapses) and consistent learning convergence when applied to simulated decision boundary matching and optical character recognition tasks. The trained networks yield character-recognition performance comparable to identically shaped networks trained with gradient descent. The approach has two significant advantages in comparison to traditional gradient-descent-based optimization methods. First, the robustness of our novel method and its lack of reliance on gradient computations opens the door to new techniques for training difficult-to-differentiate artificial neural networks, such as spiking neural networks (SNNs) and recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Second, the method’s simplicity provides a unique opportunity for further development of local information-driven multiagent connectionist models for machine intelligence analogous to cellular automata.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".