MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3167482072 · doi:10.1080/2050571x.2021.1917216

Understanding the impact of group therapy on health-related quality of life of people with Aphasia: a scoping review

2021· review· en· W3167482072 on OpenAlexaff
Carlee Wilson, C Allyson Jones, Kara Schick‐Makaroff, Esther Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueSpeech Language and Hearing · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAphasiaQuality of life (healthcare)Randomized controlled trialSpeech-Language PathologyMedicineClinical psychologyIntervention (counseling)MEDLINEPsychologyPhysical therapyPsychotherapistPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aphasia is a communication disorder, resulting in difficulty with speaking, understanding, reading, and writing. Aphasia has been linked to decreased social networks, depression, and low health-related quality of life (HRQL). Speech-language pathologists provide therapy through various models for adults with aphasia, including group speech and language therapy. This scoping review aimed to identify, summarize, and appraise peer-reviewed texts that consider HRQL in adults with aphasia who are receiving group speech and language therapy. The research questions that guided the review were: What measures were used to capture HRQL outcomes? Does HRQL change as a result of participation in group language treatment? A systematic literature search developed and implemented by a health sciences librarian identified full-text journal articles via electronic searches of five databases. To be included, studies had to explore adults with aphasia, participating in group language therapy, with a HRQL outcome measure. Relevant studies were assessed for methodological quality and level of evidence. Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria, including two randomized control trials, eight case studies, and three qualitative studies. HRQL measures used and type of intervention varied across studies. HRQL measures showed generally positive outcomes of group language therapy, and participants reported improved HRQL after group language therapy. The current evidence is not comprehensive due to the overall lack of high-quality studies and the low level of evidence available. Further well-designed studies would benefit our understanding of how group therapy may improve HRQL for adults with aphasia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.699

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.280
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpeech Language and HearingSame topicNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismFrench-language works237,207