MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nivolumab, nabpaclitaxel, and carboplatin followed by risk/response adaptive de-escalated locoregional therapy for HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer: OPTIMA II trial.

2021· article· en· W3167506953 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ari J. Rosenberg, Nishant Agrawal, Alexander T. Pearson, Tanguy Y. Seiwert, Zhen Gooi, Elizabeth A. Blair, Daniel Thomas Ginat, Adam Howard, Jeffrey Chin, Sara Kochanny, Evgeny Izumchenko, Aditya Juloori, Daniel J. Haraf, Everett E. Vokes

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBristol-Myers Squibb Canada
KeywordsMedicineCarboplatinClinical endpointInternal medicineOncologyNivolumabHead and neck cancerResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsCetuximabRadiation therapyCancerSurgeryClinical trialProgressive diseaseChemotherapyCisplatinImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

6011 Background: Despite the success of anti-PD-1 in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, incorporation in the curative setting with induction therapy has yet to be investigated. Favorable prognosis of human papillomavirus associated (HPV+) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) has led to interest in treatment de-escalation. OPTIMA 2 evaluated nivolumab (nivo) with nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by risk/response adaptive de-intensified treatment for locoregionally advanced HPV+ OPC. We report the primary analysis and outcomes. Methods: OPTIMA 2 enrolled locoregionally advanced HPV+ OPC. Nivo, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin were administered for 3 cycles. High-risk (HR) included any of the following: T4, N2c-N3 (AJCC 7 th edition), > 20 pack year smoking history, non-HPV16 subtype; All others were low-risk (LR). Arm A included LR with ≥50% post-induction shrinkage by RECIST received single-modality de-escalation with low-dose radiation (RT) alone (50 Gy) or transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Arm B included HR with ≥50% shrinkage or LR with <50% received intermediate-dose chemoradiation (CRT) to 45-50Gy. Arm C included all others and received regular dose CRT to 70-75Gy. Adjuvant nivo was administered for 6 months. The primary endpoint was deep response rate (DRR) ≥50% shrinkage to induction therapy. Results: From September 2017 until March 2020, 73 patients (pts) were eligible and started treatment. One pt died during induction. The DRR following induction was 70.8% (95% CI 60.3%, 81.3%). Median follow-up 23.1 months. Median age 61 (range 39-85), T4 12.3%, N2c/N3 19.2%, LR 47.9%, and HR 52.1%. De-escalated treatment was administered in 84.9%. Arm A N = 28, Arm B N = 34, and Arm C N = 10. 2-year progression free survival (PFS) for full cohort was 90.4% (95% CI = 79.3%, 95.7%). 2-year PFS for Arms A, B, and C were 96.3%, 85.8%, and 100.0% respectively. 2-year overall survival (OS) for full cohort was 93.3% (95% CI = 82.4%, 97.5%). 2-year OS for Arm A, B, and C were 96.0%, 91.9%, and 100.0% respectively. Among TORS (N = 9), pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 66.7%. G-tube rates in Arms A, B, and C were 7.1%, 44.1%, and 75.0% respectively (p = 0.0001). Grade 4 toxicity in arms A, B, and C, were observed in 7.1%, 8.8%, and 10.0% of pts respectively. There were 3 local failures and no distant failures. Conclusions: Nivo/nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin followed by risk/response adaptive de-escalated treatment in locoregionally advanced HPV+ OPC demonstrates excellent survival outcomes with reduced toxicity and enteral feeding rates, including high risk disease. Induction chemoimmunotherapy demonstrates a high rate of deep clinical response and represents a promising de-escalation approach that incorporates anti-PD1 in the definitive setting. High pCR rate was observed following nivo/nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin. Clinical trial information: NCT03107182.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicHead and Neck Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207