MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Influence of Phospholipase A <sub>2</sub> (PLA <sub>2</sub> ) Enzymes on Fatty Acid Release and Oxylipin Formation in Rat Hearts

2021· article· en· W3167551591 on OpenAlexafffund
Anne M. Mendonça, Tanja Winter, Harold M. Aukema

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOxylipinPolyunsaturated fatty acidArachidonic acidChemistryPhospholipase A2BiochemistryEicosapentaenoic acidGene isoformFatty acidThromboxanesDocosahexaenoic acidEnzymeIsozymeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) released by PLA 2 are converted into diverse bioactive lipid mediators called oxylipins. However, little is known about the preference of PLA 2 isoforms for PUFA release, and even less is known about how this further impacts the formation of oxylipins. Further, oxylipin levels in tissues do not always mimic the levels of their precursor PUFA, so conclusions about oxylipins cannot be drawn from PUFA content. Therefore, we aimed to determine the impact of PLA 2 isoforms on PUFA release and oxylipin formation. We hypothesized that different PLA 2 isoforms would impact PUFA release and oxylipin formation differently, and that oxylipin formation would not necessarily reflect changes seen in PUFA. Rat heart homogenates were incubated at 37C for 20 min with or without inhibitors, as the increase of both free PUFA and oxylipins was linear at 20 min incubation. Free PUFA and oxylipins were analyzed by HPLC‐MS/MS. Two inhibitors were used: Varespladib (VAR) targeting secreted (sPLA 2 ) isoforms IIA, V and X, and methyl arachidonyl fluorophosphonate (MAFP) targeting cytosolic (cPLA 2 ) and calcium‐independent (iPLA 2 ) isoforms. Arachidonic Acid (ARA) release was similarly inhibited by both VAR and MAFP, however, while 15 out of 29 ARA oxylipins were inhibited with MAFP, only 3 out of 29 were inhibited with VAR. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) release was more strongly inhibited by VAR than by MAFP, which corresponded with 7 out of 12 DHA oxylipins being more strongly inhibited by VAR than by MAFP. Both alpha‐linolenic acid (ALA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) were only inhibited by MAFP, which also inhibited 3 out of 5 ALA and 1 out of 3 EPA oxylipins. Further, 9 out of 10 LA oxylipins were inhibited by MAFP while none were affected by VAR. In conclusion, in the rat heart ARA is released by sPLA 2 IIA, V, and/or X as well as by cPLA 2 and/or iPLA 2 , DHA is released more by sPLA 2 IIA, V, and/or X than by cPLA 2 and/or iPLA 2 , and EPA and ALA are released primarily by cPLA 2 and/or iPLA 2 . Effects on oxylipin formation largely reflected those on precursor PUFA release, with an exception, as inhibition of sPLA 2 IIA, V and X by VAR mostly did not affect ARA oxylipin formation even though it inhibited ARA release. Therefore, careful evaluation of the effects on the oxylipin profile is needed when considering PLA 2 inhibitors for potential treatments of diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis→French-language works237,207→