¿Dónde está la política criminal? Derecho penal y vida cotidiana en estudios socio-jurídicos anglosajones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A partir de una pregunta metodológica – ¿dónde está la política criminal? – el presente artículo revisa la literatura en estudios socio-jurídicos anglosajones con el fin de situar metodológica y analíticamente la política criminal en el marco de investigaciones empíricas. Una revisión no exhaustiva y deliberadamente parcial de estudios clásicos en la tradición denominada “derecho y sociedad” (Law & Society) permite reflexionar respecto al rol específico de las organizaciones encargadas de aplicar el derecho penal, y a la tensión entre perspectivas funcionalistas o estructuralistas, por un lado, y perspectivas pragmatistas y empiricistas, por el otro. Tres pistas de análisis son finalmente propuestas: primero, que la política criminal se encuentra del lado del “derecho en acción”; segundo, que tener acceso a ella requiere tomar distancia respecto de concepciones normativas y funcionalistas del derecho y; tercero, que estudiarla tal y como ésta se despliega en la vida cotidiana de justiciables y operadores jurídicos implica movilizar métodos empíricos que reposen sobre una concepción no idealizada de la vida cotidiana.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".