«Вера и любовь к русской мысли»: Конспекты лекций С.Л. Франка о русской духовной культуре
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four lecture notes by S.L. Frank which kept in The Bakhmeteff Archive of Columbia University (USA) are published for the first time. Lectures were read in the second half of the 1920s the very beginning of the 1930s in Warsaw, Saarow, Belgrade, and Berlin. These are several pages of draft texts, written in ink with pencil editing according to the old spelling, built in the form of abstracts. They are united by one theme — Russian spiritual culture. In the publication, the abstracts are arranged sequentially: first, the problems of the originality of Russian thought, the religious principle in it are touched upon, then the presence of its two currents is affirmed — the religious-mystical and the social-radical, which, in unity and separation, form a wide context of Russian literature, literary criticism, journalism and philosophy 18th — first quarter of 20th century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it