X-ray induced bio-acoustic emissions from cultured cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose We characterise for the first time the emission of bio-acoustic waves from cultured cells irradiated at doses of X-ray photon radiation relevant to medical and accidental exposure. Methods and materials Human cancer cell lines (MCF-7, HL-60) and control cell-free media were exposed to 1 Gy X-ray photons while recording the sound generated before, during and after irradiation. Cellular cytotoxicity following photon irradiation was determined by extracellular LDH levels, and irradiated cell conditioned media were tested for their ability to elicit a bystander effect in reporter cells. Results We report the first recorded acoustic signals captured from a collective pressure wave response to ionising irradiation. The signature of the collective acoustic peaks was temporally wider and with higher acoustic power for irradiated HL-60 than for irradiated MCF-7. Conclusions We show that at doses of X-ray irradiation capable of producing the release of bystander effect-inducing activity, both cell types emit a characteristic acoustic signal for the duration of the radiation pulse. The rapid signal decay is consistent with a passive rather than an active acoustic signal generation. This preliminary study suggests that further work on the potential role of radiation induced acoustic emission (RIAE) in the cellular bystander effect is merited.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".