Transcutaneous versus Total Serum Bilirubin Measurements in Preterm Infants
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) measurement offers a noninvasive approach for bilirubin screening; however, its accuracy in preterm infants is unclear. This study determined the agreement between TcB and total serum bilirubin (TSB) among preterm infants. METHODS: A multisite prospective cohort study was conducted at 3 NICUs in Ontario, Canada, September 2016 to June 2018. Among 296 preterm infants born at 240/7 to 356/7 weeks, 856 TcB levels were taken at the forehead, sternum, and before and after the initiation of phototherapy with TSB measurements. Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) expressed agreement between TcB and TSB. RESULTS: The overall mean TcB-TSB difference was -24.5 μmol/L (95% LOA -103.3 to 54.3), 1.6 μmol/L (95% LOA -73.4 to 76.5) before phototherapy, and -31.1 μmol/L (95% LOA -105.5 to 43.4) after the initiation of phototherapy. The overall mean TcB-TSB difference was -15.2 μmol/L (95% LOA -86.8 to 56.3) at the forehead and -24.4 μmol/L (95% LOA -112.9 to 64.0) at the sternum. The mean TcB-TSB difference was -31.4 μmol/L (95% LOA -95.3 to 32.4) among infants born 24-28 weeks, -25.5 μmol/L (95% LOA -102.7 to 51.8) at 29-32 weeks, and -15.9 μmol/L (95% LOA -107.4 to 75.6) at 33-35 weeks. Measures did not differ by maternal ethnicity. CONCLUSION: Among preterm infants, TcB may offer a noninvasive, immediate approach to screening for hyperbilirubinemia with more careful use in preterm infants born at <33 weeks' gestation, as TcB approaches treatment thresholds. Its underestimation of TSB after the initiation of phototherapy warrants the use of TSB for clinical decision-making after the initiation of phototherapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it