La route comme mémoire et comme technologie : Essai sur la dimension philosophique des routes culturelles.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Qu’est-ce qu’une route? Pourquoi est-elle omniprésente? Poursuivant cette enquête sur la problématique philosophico-définitionnelle du concept de la route, ce texte propose dans un premier temps une réflexion à partir du corpus heideggérien pour développer une pensée de la route culturelle comme technè en tant que médium de communication, donc un artéfact culturel. Or, en tant qu’artéfact, la route se présente aussi comme ce dont à travers lequel tous les autres objets culturels, y compris le langage lui-même, s’avancent dans l’apparaitre. Elle est le mode qu’empruntent tous les artéfacts culturels pour rejoindre le monde. Le texte conclura sur une conception de la route qui l’identifie à ce que Bernard Stiegler (1998) appelle (après Gilles Simondon) « préindividuelle » comme fondement d’une anthropologie philosophique où la route culturelle apparait comme source et du politique et de la culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".