MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3167815843 · doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.66

Impact of an Infrastructure Development Policy on Health, Poverty & Crime Actions in Indonesia (Case Study in Majalengka District)

2021· article· en· W3167815843 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Entang Adhy Muhtar, Budiman Rusli

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Criminology and Sociology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTollPovertyLife expectancyPopulationSocioeconomicsDeath tollWelfareDemographyGeographySociologyEconomicsEconomic growthMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the construction of toll roads, the welfare of the people in the area has also changed. Toll road infrastructure plays a very important role in supporting the economy, social, culture, unity, and dynamics of community life. Majalengka Regency is one of the areas affected by the construction of the Cipali Toll Road (Cikampek-Palimanan). The results showed that in 2014, the life expectancy at birth in Majalengka Regency was only 68.66 years, and in 2019 it had reached 69.97 years. 85.43 percent of households live in their own houses, the remaining 14.57 percent of households live in houses that are not their own. When viewed at a glance, the percentage of own homeownership status in the 2018-2019 period, it can be seen that the percentage of the population who live in their own homes has increased by around 7 percent. The poor population in Majalengka Regency in total showed a downward trend during the 2015-2019 period (a condition in March). In 2015, the number of poor people was 167.50 thousand people or 14.19 percent of the total population of Majalengka Regency. In the 2019 period, the population who became victims of crime continued to experience a decline by 0.72 points to 0.88 percent compared to 2018 which reached 1.60.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Criminology and SociologySame topicData Mining and Machine Learning ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207