MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3167899791

From ‘creatures of the government’ to ‘proximity government’: The sinuous path of Quebec municipalities

2017· article· en· W3167899791 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne Mévellec, Guy Chiasson, Yann Fournis

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue francaise dadministration publique · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbandonment (legal)General partnershipCreaturesGovernment (linguistics)Local governmentCivil societyPublic administrationPolitical scienceEconomic growthPublic policyGeographyEconomyEconomicsPoliticsLawArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Municipalities in Canada have often been considered as creatures of the provinces. However, in Quebec, the provincial government has recently recognized them as “proximity governments”. This new policy brings an original response to the issue of municipal fragmentation. On the one hand, the new policy confirms the predominance of the local level as well as the abandonment of a regional model based on a partnership between civil society and local elected officials. On the other hand, this package of reform opens a new legal and financial chapter in the complex relationship between the province and the municipalities, mainly the bigger cities who are the main beneficiaries of this status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0210.022
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue francaise dadministration publique→Same topicSocial Sciences and Governance→French-language works237,207→