MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3167920770 · doi:10.1093/imrn/rnab119

Erratum: “Breaking the 3/2 barrier for unit distances in three dimensions”

2021· erratum· en· W3167920770 on OpenAlexaff
Micha Sharir, Joshua Zahl

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Mathematics Research Notices · 2021
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEllipseMathematicsIntersection (aeronautics)Lemma (botany)Unit (ring theory)Statement (logic)Plane (geometry)GeometryPure mathematicsMathematics educationGeographyLawCartographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We wish to correct an error in the paper “Breaking the 3/2 barrier for unit distances in three dimensions.” Lemma 3.2 of this paper contained an incorrect claim about the intersection patterns of ellipses obtained by projecting circles from three dimensions to the plane. In this erratum we state and prove a correct version of this statement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.049
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.049
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0050.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Mathematics Research NoticesSame topicComputational Geometry and Mesh GenerationFrench-language works237,207