MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Indoor levels and personal exposures to traffic pollution and environmental noise among retired adults in urban Colombia

2020· article· en· W3167967272 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental healthNeighbourhood (mathematics)Diesel fuelAir pollutionPollutantTraffic noiseNoise pollutionPollutionRoad trafficGeographyEnvironmental engineeringMedicineTransport engineeringMathematicsEcologyWaste managementBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Exposures to traffic-related air pollution and urban environmental noise are poorly understood in low and middle-income countries, where vehicle fleets, road conditions, and housing differ from high-income settings. We characterized exposures to air pollutants and noise among retired adults in urban Bucaramanga, Colombia. Methods: We selected 4 neighbourhoods that represented a range of traffic settings: high traffic/high diesel, high traffic/low diesel, low traffic/low diesel, and low traffic/low diesel/high braking. In each neighbourhood, we measured outdoor PM2.5 and black carbon (BC) for 6 days and selected ~20 homes with retired adults and measured indoor levels and exposures to PM2.5 and black carbon (BC), and indoor noise. Results: Indoor concentrations and exposures to PM2.5 and BC ranged from (in ug/m3) 10.2-17.7 and 2.2-3.0, respectively, and BC comprised 12-29% of PM2.5. The high traffic/high diesel neighbourhood had the highest PM2.5 levels (ug/m3): outdoor=15.1 (± 7.1), indoor=17.3 (± 6.8), personal=17.7 (± 5.6). The low traffic/low diesel neighbourhood had the lowest indoor PM2.5 and exposures but the highest BC. Indoor noise levels did not very much between neighbourhoods and ranged from 54.5-57.1 dBa. Correlations between indoor concentrations and exposures to PM2.5 were moderate-to-strong and positive in all neighbourhoods, while for BC, correlations varied from near 0 to moderate and positive. Weak inverse correlations were observed between air pollution (indoor and exposure) and noise. Conclusion: Average exposures to PM2.5 were lower than the WHO’s 24-h guideline (25 ug/m3), though indoor noise levels exceeded the WHO Europe’s guideline (35 dBa). The low correlations between indoor and exposure levels of BC may indicate additional sources of BC exposure. Similarly, while traffic is a major source air pollutants and noise in urban areas, we observe that these variables are weakly (and inversely in some cases) related, which may be related to other local sources of these pollutants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it