MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3167970530 · doi:10.82308/41871

Climate change and mosquito-borne arboviruses: an examination of current and future potential range changes of «Culex pipiens» in Canada

2010· article· en· W3167970530 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Valérie Hongoh

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsCulex pipiensDengue feverGeographyVirologyBiologyEcologyLarva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given current and projected climate change, the range distribution of a number of species, including mosquito vectors, is anticipated to shift geographically with implications for the transmission dynamics of vector-borne diseases carried by specialized species. This thesis examines the risk factors for human incidence of mosquito-borne disease in Canada and characterizes the climatic determinants of the current range distribution of Culex pipiens, a known mosquito vector of arboviruses found in Canada. Spatial statistical models were developed from mosquito surveillance data collected by Canadian provinces over the last decade and are used to give an estimation of the current habitat suitability of this species in Canada. Habitat suitability for Culex pipiens under projected climate change is also examined for three future time periods. Results predict a significant range expansion of Culex pipiens' suitable habitat northward into the year 2100 with potential implications for disease transmission resulting from changing biodiversity within communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change→French-language works237,207→