MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3168004539

SES no.104; Preface

2021· article· en· W3168004539 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMapleHistoryBiologyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whales are an informal grouping within the infraorder Cetacea, comprising about 85 species or subspecies such as the blue whale, sperm whale, small beluga, harbor porpoise, and many more.Humans have used whales for many purposes, most notably as food and industrial resources.Human-whale relationships have varied both regionally and historically.In Japan, for example, dolphins have been caught for at least the last 5,000 years; in Alaska and Siberia, whale hunts by the Iupiat/Yupiit may have begun as early as 3,000 to 2,500 years ago.From medieval times until the 20th century, the people of Europe, North America, and elsewhere have hunted whales for food, lamp fuel, lubricants, and other purposes.However, at the 1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm, the Secretary-General of the conference argued that the environment could not be protected without saving whales.This argument was supported by many governments, including that of the United States, and environmental NGOs.At the conference, most of the participant countries adopted anti-whaling positions, no longer accepting whales as commercial resources.Thus, the conference was a symbolic turning point in the history of humans' relationship with whales, despite a moratorium on commercial whaling not being approved at the general meeting of the International Whaling Commission (IWC) that same year.In 1982, the IWC amended the Schedule to the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW), an international agreement concerning the use and protection of large whales: Moratorium was imposed on the catching of 13 species of large whales, beginning in 1986.Following this amendment, the government of Japan suspended commercial whaling in Antarctic waters in March 1987 and off the coast of Japan in March of the following year.Since that time, neither pro-nor anti-whaling countries have obtained the three-fourths majority required to amend the Schedule.Commercial whaling remained a highly contentious issue at the annual IWC meetings.Since the late 20th century, the political trends in the whaling issue have been influenced by international environment and animal protection NGOs campaigning globally against commercial and other whaling activities; as a result of their efforts to change the relationship between human and whales, whales have become targets for protection and preservation, not just targets for exploitation.Diverse whaling activities have continued in many places.Whaling has continued among several indigenous groups in Russia, the United States, Greenland, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines under the name of "Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling" under the IWC, and it has continued among several indigenous and local groups in Canada and Indonesia outside the IWC system.Many local and indigenous groups worldwide have also engaged in dolphin and porpoise hunting, which is not controlled by the IWC.Japan carried out research whaling until June, 2019, and Norway and Iceland resumed commercial whaling with several conditions under IWC rules.At the same time, international environment

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it