MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3168046851

Astashine Silver Capsules: An Excellent Choice to Maintain Healthy Skin

2017· article· en· W3168046851 on OpenAlexaff
Govind Shukla, C. J. Yaparthy, Sampath Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Canadian institutionsNutrasource
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAstaxanthinSunburnSkin AgingSkin cancerMedicineCarnitineHealth benefitsDermatologyHuman skinAntioxidantChemistryFood scienceInternal medicineBiologyCarotenoidBiochemistryTraditional medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Excessive exposure of unprotected skin to sunlight results in sunburn and can also lead to photo-induced oxidation, inflammation, immunosuppression, aging and even carcinogenesis of skin cells. Pre-clinical studies show that typical dietary antioxidant, could reduce such damages. Astaxanthin is believed to protect the skin against UV-light photo-oxidation and the in vitro protective effect of astaxanthin against UV-induced photooxidation was stronger when compared with β-carotene and lutein. These findings suggest that astaxanthin has an excellent potential as an oral sun-protectant. L-Carnitine is Traditionally used as a nutritional supplement in applications such as Weight management programs, Promotion of heart health as well as Enhancement of exercise recovery. L-Carnitine Acts at a cellular level to deliver advanced skin health appearance benefits. Several studies shown that Astaxanthin & L-Carnitine Combination in Astashine silver capsule is supportive of skin health and in particular Contributes to skin strength and elasticity and thus Promotes maintenance of effective skin barrier to maintain healthy skin hydration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressFrench-language works237,207