MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3168049248 · doi:10.4133/sageep.33-104

Hydrogeophysical characterization of soap holes on the Alberta Prairies: Unique groundwater discharge features

2021· article· en· W3168049248 on OpenAlex
Landon Woods, R. M. Lauer, Cathy Ryan, Sarah Reid

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2021 · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwaterCharacterization (materials science)Environmental scienceSOAPHydrology (agriculture)GeologyRemote sensingComputer scienceGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soap holes manifest as localized areas of water-saturated, weak sediments which render farmland uncroppable and hazardous to both livestock and farm equipment. Their formation mechanisms and global distribution have largely been unknown, despite being inferred as groundwater discharge phenomena on the semi-arid Alberta Prairies more than 50 years ago. Here, we propose the first conceptual model for soap hole formation and persistence using electrical resistivity tomography, one year of hydraulic and temperature monitoring, sediment analyses, and geochemical data (sediment and groundwater) from two locations in Alberta, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it