MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3168201827

楽山園(台湾のハンセン病救療施設)の歴史的評価

2021· article· ja· W3168201827 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
一広 輪倉

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The full-scale leprosy relief services in Taiwan was carried out by two facilities, a government-run Rakusei-in established by the Taiwan Governor’ s Office and a Rakuzan-en founded by the Canadian Presbyterian missionary and physician Gushue-Taylor. The role played by Gushue-Taylor and Rakuzan-en, a manifestation of his idea of medical relief, was very different from that of the foreign missionaries who contributed to leprosy relief in Japan. His work as a physician was a unique effort aimed at rehabilitating non-severe patients while complementing the leprosy policy of the Government-General of Taiwan. This time, the writer had the opportunity to visit the old Rakuzan-en, which is now Happy Mount Colony, so In this paper, I would like to evaluate the history of Rakusan-en..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.014
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)→Same topicMilitary Technology and Strategies→French-language works237,207→